An Attack On Innocents

This is my take on the caning issue. I wrote this some time back in response to another column by a writer who advocated the use of caning based on her experience with her six children, but I think it is just as valid today. I am a mother of two children and have never used any instrument on my children. There was the odd smack when I was unable to think straight, but I am not proud of it.

As a parent myself, I find that I am unable to agree with the view that caning is beneficial in the discipline of children. I see no good example being set by a parent who would use his/her greater physical strength against someone of lesser size. All that the child is likely to learn in this situation is that it is acceptable to hit someone else if you do not agree with them, and that the only condition you have to adhere to is that there is distinct disequilibrium favoring you in size. Children who are hit by their parents tend to go out and hit other people. It’s as simple as that.

It is often stated by people who support the caning of innocents that this form of punishment, when carried out in a calm and measured manner, sends children the very clear message that there are consequences for any transgression and these will be meted out with consistency by parents who take the time to explain to their children why they are going to be attacked.

The reality of the situation is very different. There is something eerie about a parent approaching the child calmly with an instrument of torture in his/her hand and informing the child that he/she is about to receive six of the best because “we love you enough to punish you when you do wrong”. Because this is really what a parent who canes his/her child is saying- “I cannot conceive of any other more intelligent way of dealing with the situation. This is my admission of failure as a parent”. No matter how calmly the parent approaches the situation, the cane in the hand belies any evidence of rational thought.

Some proponents of caning turn the debate into one that argues the necessity of discipline, allowing them to take the high ground of those who would rather see their children grow up into responsible citizens than hooligans who run wild. The removal of this smokescreen is necessary for us to see that everyone believes discipline is important. The question is how? How do we show children that there are consequences for bad behavior? The answer lies not in whacking kids senseless after they have failed to adhere to our standards of behavior, but in setting them up for success by clearly modeling the type of responses we expect from them.

This is where parents need to see the difference between proactive and reactive discipline. The former involves guiding children into behaving well so that the situation does not arise where you need to physically reprimand them in the first place. Will they then never do wrong? Of course not. But this type of discipline involves so much communication between parent and child that one glance from the parent is enough to signal to the child that he/she is straying from the path. Proactive parents work hard to keep channels of communication with their children open so that there are never any hidden agendas. At all times, each knows how the other is feeling, and it is a relationship based on trust.

Reactive discipline is certainly easier, but nowhere near as effective. Proponents of this type of discipline are those who believe that quality time makes up for a lack of quantity. So distant do they become from their children that the first signal they get that something is wrong is when their children misbehave. Out comes the cane, marking the beginning of a session that treats the symptom, while completely ignoring the cause. Very often, perpetrators of this type of violence manage to convince their children that it is for their own good that they are undergoing the punishment. This is exactly how abusers bring their victims under control.

In my experience most children do have a desire to please the authority figures in their lives. Children whose parents put effort into disciplining them proactively often fear, more than anything else, that behaving badly will disappoint their parents or teachers. Many of those who are used to getting caned tend to respond only when caning is threatened. After a while even this threat does not work, and parents have to keep raising the bar.

There is no shortcut to good parenting. It takes time, love, compassion and understanding. It must start from birth. If this aspect is ignored then by the time parents feel there is no way to discipline their children other than by using a cane, it will in all likelihood be too late anyway. A mother of six once wrote an article in this paper in which she likened caning a six-year-old who tells a lie to smacking the hand of a baby who touches an electrical cord. It is very different, for the simple reason that the six-year- old is perfectly able to understand other forms of discipline (the baby can also be gently diverted from the electrical cord, and be presented with less dangerous and more engaging stimuli). I’d like to recommend that people only have the number of children that they can deal with intelligently- you should not have to whack them up because you don’t have the time to get to know each one well.


7 thoughts on “An Attack On Innocents

  1. Mrs V,

    Hi there! Happy New Year to you.

    In regards of caning, like what you have said, it is best not to use Mr Cane. I was one abused kid when very young till in my teen years, thus, from a good result student in a good primary sch, I became rebellious and poor academic student with low self confidence and fear towards my family members, even up to now. Everytime I have done a small mistake at home, I will fear being scolded, even up till now by my close ones.

    But, in terms of disciplinary methods which I use on my son, Mr Cane is one of the tools. We will explain to him nicely for first time round, stating what he has done is wrong. If he does it again, we will tell him in a strict manner and tone. When he does it again for 3rd time, knowing that he knows that he shouldn’t do it this way, we will have to threaten him with the cane.

    In fact, we are trying not to introduce the cane, but as he has been used to be getting his own ways with the main care taker (my in laws), we have no choice but use it at the minimum. Currently, we are monitoring his behaviour and such, so to see what is the best method of discipline to be used on him. Caning is only a temporary method, which does not apply throughout a very long period.

    Thanks for sharing your views, prior to the article printed out in The Sunday Times. This is a good for me to reflect on this caning issue. 🙂

    1. But you know, it sounds to me like the cane has more to do with your in-law issues than with what is best for your son! If I am right, then I don’t think your son should bear the brunt of this baggage.

  2. The cane defenitely should be locked in a box, which is then sealed with duct tape and locked with padlocks and thrown into the depths of a volcano. Children subconsiously mimic our actions and learn more than we think they might at a young age, and hurting them is almost like telling them it’s okay to hurt someone who’s misbehaved. I was never hit by my parents, I got the message more clearly when someone explained everyting to me.

    1. As must be obvious, I completely agree with you. It takes more time to build up to that sort of communicative parenting, but it’s definitely worth it!

  3. hi mrs v,

    i was just wondering if our school still has a debating team and if they are taking part in this year’s JGs?


  4. hey mrs v.

    haha. if the offer is real, i wouldnt mind coming back after a’s.
    but. . . i asked mainly because i will be shadow-adjudicating at JGs these few fridays. i had hoped that i might catch a glimpse of the swiss debates team considering that LDDS has been around for only two or three years.

    i guess not then.
    thx loads =]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s